Thursday, December 10, 2009

Good restaurants or events taking place this weekend? (non-halloween related)?

Hey. For NYC residents, are there any good (inexpensive) restaurants or events taking place in the city this weekend (11/2-11/4)? Please let me know. I would like to take my boyfriend out for a good weekend. We are interested in movies opening, restaurants, free concerts....etc. Thanks.



Good restaurants or events taking place this weekend? (non-halloween related)?theatre



Nov 2 - Melting Pot Food Tour in Little Italy/China Town, Tours are $45 and 3 hours long. Reservations are required. 646-209-4724



Nov 2- Fire and Ice Dance Party at Club 412, 412 8th Ave @ 31 St, 4th FL, 212-244-0011, $10 per person, Dress Code: Sleek %26amp; Spicy.



Nov 2 - Film Screening of "Tamarind Art", 142 East 39th St. New York, NY 10016, 212-990-9000



*For more events, click link below



And if are looking for a good restaurant, I would recommend the following restaurants:



Hawaii Sushi, Mars 2112, Gotham Bar %26amp; Grill, Three of Cups, Mooncake Foods, New York Burger Co.



You can find cheap deals for restaurants too when you go to restaurant.com. Its like buying a gift certificate for the restaurant that you would like to go to at a cheaper price. A $25 gift certificate would only cost you $5, depending on the prices for the week but it is definitely worth it to check out.



~Hope this helps.



Good restaurants or events taking place this weekend? (non-halloween related)?opera music opera theater



http://carmineristoranteitaliano.dgte.ph
great inexpensive play: http://platanosandcollardgreens.com/



food:



sharkbar (soul food: nice ambiance/great food)



carmines(italian: larg plates that can be shared)



benihanna(japanese hibachi)



Havanna Central (cuban/spanish)
Friday and Saturday nights you will find a great band playing at O'Flannagans bar 1st Ave bet 65th and 66th. No Cover and the food is inexpensive and gooood. You get alot for your money

Are UFC/Pride/K-1 type events the only benchmark for determining M.A. effectiveness?

The goal of Pride/UFC/K-1 type fighting events are to win by knockouts (KO's or TKO's), submissions, or scoring decision. Fights occur in a controlled environment (ie - the ring) with one-on-one adversaries. Training is specifically focused on acheiving these goals. I am going to make an assumption that fighters go into every match with the personal goal to knockout their opponent, or force a submission because it is a more definitive victory. With all of this in mind, the fighting they do is extremely effective for the goals they are striving to achieve, and I have a lot of respect for their skills.



However, TKO, KO, and submissions are not the only possible goals, or outcomes to a fight. Also more variables exist in the proverbial "real world", such as, terrain, space, multiple combatants, etc. So are these types of events really the only gauge of "effectiveness" for all styles of Martial Arts? If it's not "ring worthy", is it automatically worthless?



Are UFC/Pride/K-1 type events the only benchmark for determining M.A. effectiveness?pacific theater



the opposite of the last sentence is true. the ring is made as safe as it can be with rules. a kick to the back of the head is awesome, yet not allowed.pulling the ballbags away from the body are not allowed, but they are not worthless.



the ring is ruled by rules. the world outside has no rules. this is more dangerous. MMA, K-1 etc are only gauges of those fighters abilities within the rules that determine the sport. that guy 'cabbage' got knocked teh hell out and mugged by 2 guys. what went wrong? he is a vicious fighter, yet he trains for his sport under those conditions.



the guys who took him out fought their way. multiple attackers, knock out hits. the no rules won again.



I love MMA, K-1 etc, but nothing beats watching these guys get wasted. as a doorman, I have seen local guys fight well, and also seen them get wasted by unorthodox dirty sh!t. but all is fair in violence.



so these sports only gauge the persons level of skill within the sport, not at how they are outside. it is easier to fight in a ring than down an alley. the rings danger is finite, the streets danger is infinite.



I dont damn them, but am aware of limitation. if they trained for the sport and did crazy street essentials, then awesome. but money to be made means training only for the money winner.



though more options in MMA make it closer to the real, as opposed to TKD tournaments. head kick point sparring at its worst in respect to the street.



Are UFC/Pride/K-1 type events the only benchmark for determining M.A. effectiveness?phantom of the opera opera theater



Yeah I see what you mean. I suppose "actual fighting" where there are no rules at all would be the best in a street fight, but then most people would probably just do the things that are banned in the ring (eg groin attacks, eye gouging, biting etc) and it would be very hard to have more than 1 fight if this was a martial art as most people would end up dead or completely bashed to ****!



Nevertheless, I love watching fights, whether at MMA comp or in the street
ring fighting has or never will have any influence on the effectivness of martial arts.it's a popular misconception by people who think they are martial artists that these types of events are a benchmark as to whats good and whats not.i have seen many martial artists that have rooms full of trophys, awards and, ribbons as well as championship belts get absolutely flogged in a real situation.and thats 1 on 1.how would they go against multiple opponents.
Yes it is the benchmark of MA That's why they are held. As to say eye gouging, groin kicks etc.. are not allowed they are not allowed in the disciplinary teaching/training of martial arts any way. As for multiple attacks well the people in the ufc,pride,k1 would be more prepared than you or I(i) Because they are smashing machines. This is why it is (MIXED MARTIAL ARTS so you are prepared for the best of most situations. NOT 1 fighter fights under one technique or method because it has been shown that it does not work. Do Not make the assumption that there are alternative people and or ways that could work better on the street. The only thing the ref is there for is so no one gets killed and they live to fight another day.
SO many people argue this point... It's ridiculous.



"You shouldn't gauge martial arts in a competition with minimal rules only in place for the fighter's safety. Instead you shouldn't test your skills at all."



You clearly don't understand what you can gain from fighting a live resisting opponent, determined to win, who is able to do all but permantly disable you (would you fight with eye gouging?). There are many things you learn that have NOTHING to do with the ring, the rules, the canvas, such as the mental game.



I would favor a top rated MMA fighter over a theoretical MA black belt ANY DAY in a NO RULES FIGHT. You think that Kung Fu practitioners are the only ones who know how to kick someone in the nuts or poke them in the eye? Those moves can be incorporated in a fight by a MMA easily.



Someone that makes the argument you are making only sees the violence in the ring, not the mind games and the chess match. If you wanna work in the theoretical field of MA GO RIGHT AHEAD, just don't get upset that some operate in the practical, painful side.



People who train for MMA, train HARD. They fight ALL THE TIME. How can you say that gettign your *** kicked and kicking *** are not the best ways to train. I suppose the best way to train to kick *** is to hit dummies, meditate and practice matrix style.



PS Also, show me evidence of someone winning a fight 1 vs %26gt;1...

How would you explain these historical events to a 10 yr. old? (Answer Quickly, please?)?

First off: SERIOUS ANSWERS ONLY!!! I WANT ACCURACY!! NO BULLSHITTING IT!



I need to explain these events to a group of 10 year olds....I'm not sure how to do it....They are all part of the French Revolution.



They all are rather complicated. Please help?



Oh, and quickly too, please?



1.Meeting of the Estates General



2. The Tennis Court Oath



3. The Storming of Bastille



4. The March on Versailles



5. The Reign of Terror



6. The Rise of Napoleon



I would also appreciate a brief description of the condions of France in the late 1780's, and how a brief explainatoion of how these events represented a step toward Democracy (of France)



Please and Thank you!



~ Emi



How would you explain these historical events to a 10 yr. old? (Answer Quickly, please?)?the grand theater



Well Steve is good for the Historical part so I wont re-write that. I think you can get the steps toward Democracy from his answer. Now for the kids and how to explain.



Make it a story that gets them involved:



First, if you can actually interact with them, get one to stand aside as the King. Then the rest of them can be merchants, peasants, craftsmen...ect. Now at the time France was run by a King, who was greedy and rich, who had all the power to himself. The people had nothing to say. ( Last time they were respresented in the Estate General was before Louis XIV early 1600's)



Now, on this day, the peasants ect...decided to meet at the Estate General to demand that the King listen to them. They even marched onto the nearby tennis courts to promise each other that they would not give up until he gave in to them.



When the King only showed that he was afraid and did not want to help them, they got angry and stormed the prison where the King had people put who he didnt like. They then marched on his palace at Versailles. They were angry and yelling wanting the King to be killed.



Finally, the King was captured and killed. Now the people could rule themselves but since they had not for so long, they didn't remember how to do it and keep everyone happy. So people were violent and there was chaos for many years. Then one day, a military man, who had helped France against it's enemies during this revolution became the answer to their problems. Napoleon restored order and promised the people who had revolted aginst the King what they wanted and the France under Napoleon began.



Obviously, you dont need to touch on specifics because that is too complicated. Get hem to understand the basics. The need to have a say, the long time the King had control, the desire to be free and equal...things that a 10 year old might understand.



It is not an easy task..but you can definately do it. Put the King on one side on top of a chair and have them take him down at some point! That will probably be an event in itself! ;)



How would you explain these historical events to a 10 yr. old? (Answer Quickly, please?)?soap opera opera theater



i cant it would help u much but as u can see ..none answered ur question because u stated no bullshitting.



http://www.socialstudiesforkids.com/arti...



http://www.elbalero.gob.mx/kids/history/...



http://www.academickids.com/encyclopedia...



http://academickids.com/encyclopedia/n/n...



The research for ur question is not worth two points, none would bother to answer.. i wouldnt have too.. but u said that they are for a bunch of kids. For the kids... they deserve everything, that includes my time regardless of the points; the best i could.
I am a writer myself. I suggest you write three or four paragraphs on each one and then look at the vocabulary.



I can tell you right now that the important events for the kids will be the storming of the Bastille and the March on Versailles, THEN the Reign of Terror culminating with the beheading of Louis XVI and Marie Antoinette.



The Rise of Napoleon should be treated as a separate subject.



If you find yourself writing too much on each subject, go ahead, then cut it down to quick statements.



Oh, and you could do parallels between the French Revolution and our life today. How would we feel if we had no food, no jobs, etc?
1. Part of the government of France of 1789 was left over from the Middle Ages. In the Middle Ages, only those taxes and fees could be collected that were traditional, that had "always been." To get a new grant of money, the king had to summon representatives of the first estate (clergy), second estate (nobility), and third estate (commoners) to vote it to him. In England, the king had summoned the three estates since the 1200's. They evolved into Parliament, and in particular, the Commons, through their Speaker, was able to extract change from the king in return for the extraordinary money grants. In France, the estates general had not met since the 1200's. When the king's government did summon them to meet, they demanded thoroughgoing change. The king's ministers tried to dissolve the estates. This led to



2. The Oath on the Tennis Court. The delegates marched out of the palace in Paris where they were meeting onto an adjacent tennis court. There, they took an oath that they would not disband until their demands were met.



3. Storming of the Bastille. The Bastille was an infamous prison where political prisoners were kept. In particular, it was the custom of the king's ministers to issue "lettres de cachet." These were commands signed by the king letting any one fill in the name of another person and have that person sent to the Bastille. In July 1789, a mob stormed the Bastille and tore it down.



(Note to teacher: It would be good if you could search the internet for a picture of the Bastille. It was truly an awesome fortress. Also, if you or any pupils in your class ever get to Mount Vernon in Virginia, the home of George Washington, you can see the key to the Bastille, which was sent to Washington by the Marquis de Lafayette.)



4. The March on Versailles. I have to plead ignorance.



5. The Reign of Terror. Once the king and the royal government were overthrown, the people were furious at the clergy and the nobility that were part of the system that had oppressed them. Rather than a president, prime minister, and parliament, there arose the Committee of Public Safety. This large body was led by such revolutionaries as Maximilien Robespierre, Georges Danton, and Jean-Paul Marat.



(Note to teacher: It is worth your while to Google these names and get mini biographies of them for yourself and the class. As you read, you will appreciate the quote, "The revolution devoured its children.")



The Committee of Public Safety ordered mass executions by the guillotine of all aristocrats (nobles) they could find. King Louis XVI, queen Marie Antoinette, and their son Louis were first detained and then captured when they tried to escape in 1792. The king and queen were beheaded, and Louis probably died of neglect in a prison. The Terror finally burned itself out, with Marat assassinated by Charlotte Corday and Danton and Robespierre going to the guillotine.



6. Napoleon's rise was subtle. He was a graduate of the military academy of St. Cyr. At 19, he joined the revolution. The Committee of Public Safety made him a general. Most other French officers were either nobles or sided against the revolution. Other European countries made war on France. This was because these countries were ruled by monarchies, and they feared that the French revolution could be contagious. Napoleon made his name when the British attacked the French port city of Toulon, and he led a successful defense. In 1795, Napoleon joined with others to form a government called the Consulate, with himself as First Consul. European countries continued to attack France, and Napoleon continued to defeat their armies and conquer a lot of Italy and Germany. In spring of 1804, Napoleon held a referendum on whether he should adopt the title Emperor of the French. He won. He crowned himself emperor in December 1804.



Democracy in France. Actually, democracy in France was slow in coming. The period 1789-1795 is called the First Republic, but it was dominated by the Terror and the Directory, which were more mob rule. After the final defeat and exile of Napoleon in 1815, the kings were restored, Louis XVIII and Charles X. In 1830, a revolution overthrew Charles X and brought in the "citizen king" Louis Phillipe. He ruled as a constitutional monarch, though people were still unsatisfied, and he was overthrown in 1848. From 1848-1852 was the Second Republic. The first president under the Second Republic was Louis Napoleon Bonaparte, nephew of the original. In 1852, he was so popular that he declared himself emperor Louis Napoleon III. He ruled as a constitutional monarch until the defeat of France in the Franco-Prussian war of 1870. He was overthrown, and the French established the Third Republic, which lasted until 1940, when the Germans invaded France. So you could say that the French had to wait 80 years until 1870 to get true democracy.

Puerto Rico Current Events?

can you please tell me some current events that have been happening in puerto rico? i need this for homework and i cant seem to find anything.



please don't post an insignificant article about little things going on (like if a fireman saves a cat stuck in a tree)



Puerto Rico Current Events?chinese theater



I found a link or two that hopefully will help u out. good luck.



http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=puerto+...



http://www.woso.com/home.asp



Puerto Rico Current Events?opera mini opera theater



Well there is alwasy a huge debate in PR to decide if they should become a state or become an independent country or stay as is (a commonwealth of the US). %26amp; also it is hurricane season so any hurricane coming through the caribbean must be watched %26amp; makes headlines.



-Also here is the newest story. Lloren Torres is a huge notoriously bad projects in PR. There was a recent drug/weapons bust there. This is big news b/c usually the cops are too afraid to go in there!



http://www.puertoricowow.com/news/eng/ne...



-Also thousands in Bayamon are left with no water:



http://www.puertoricowow.com/news/eng/ne...



-5 horses have west nile virus:



http://www.puertoricowow.com/news/eng/ne...



-

Opinions on current events?

why is ok to slag off Americans, Poles, Eastern Europeans, on current events yet as soon as anybody says anything anti Islamic/Muslim everyone is up in arms.



Is it currently in "vogue" to be pro-Islamic/anti American?



Dont bother telling me I have said nasty things about Muslims cos I know I have.



There is a definite gang mentality on here and its very interesting to see.



What is your take on this ?



Opinions on current events?star theater



you could be right



it is definitely acceptable to criticise US, Eastern Europeans etc but any criticism at all about muslims is likely to cause a riot



the muslims object (naturally) and the PC brigade run and kiss their wounded a***s.



i am not anti-American - i am pro-American - and saying so earned me 13 thumbs down (a record for me) - i may now be the target of some of these trolls i hear so much about......



there is gang mentality on yahoo - and i can honestly say - i don't KNOW anyone personally;i don't agree with questions to be PC; i don't agree with my 'friends'; i don't tell people how intelligent, articulate etc they are; i don't agree with 'myself' and my clones (i don't have any);i tell the truth and some people don't like it.



EDIT



just read kamran's answer - proof - 'americ**ts' - used liberally when spilling anti-american cr**



Opinions on current events?extension opera theater



There is not a gang mentality on here but there is people with very differing views and sometimes there is some polarisation
What about the Scottish ? It seems that it is in fashion to be anti-Scottish.We have been called everything under the sun and more lately.
you missed out slagging scots
I think you are right.
My take is that you are very observant. This area is overrun by shrill voices of anti-Americans and terrorist sympathizers.



That said, there does appear to be a contingent of quieter and saner-minded folks who balance out some of the thumbs. I'm surprised that some of my comments get as many thumbs-ups as they do, given the mostly far-left wanker crowd that dominates around here.



Edit: Kamran's so vain, he probably thinks this comment is about him. Little does he know that his ego has some serious competition.
It's the same in Religion %26amp; Spirituality. Personally I'm pro-America, anti-Islam and I don't care who my opinion offends. There is a gang mentality but it doesn't bother me becuase unlike muslims I respect other people's (except theirs obviously) right to have different opinions than mine. I think certain groups are shocked that people are no longer afraid of being inaccurately accused of racism if they voice opposition to Islam.
100% correct! Gang mentality? You got it in one and I will show you.



Not on here, email and I will let you know.
lots of groups of people and even idividuals get slagged off on here and NONE of it is OK.



The anti-Islamic thing gets to me because a large proportion of it is sheer ignorance.
Hi Ditto! How are ya babe? Of course you are right. I posted a question the other day concerning muslims that was nowhere near as offensive as some of the anti-American crap I've seen on here, in fact, I felt it was done with a nice touch of irony and not the usual meanspiritedness you see in these parts. However, nobody, save one, seemed to "get it", I got called a racist in every imaginable way, received a violation, and had the question deleted. The funny thing was, I asked this in current events, about a current event, and 95% of the people who replied had no clue what I was referring to. If that's typical of what's going on here, they should do away with the Current Events title, and rename the board, The Place To Shoot Off Your Mouth About Topics On Which You Are Completely Misinformed.
i know you are referring to me



prove i am anti polish, eastern European



http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/question/ind...



don't play dumb, you accuse me of being anti-American (no such thing) and a polish hater, please back up your lies

I i wnat to establish an events company but it will be more into christian events like bible quiz an

i want to going into events management if you have any advice and if you are into one already we can may be partner



I i wnat to establish an events company but it will be more into christian events like bible quiz and choir?opera songs



i have a friend who does family fun fairs. He has a big grill and several of those kids blow up things (moon bounce, giant slide, etc) and a big truck that opens into a stage. He works with local churches, advertise everything is free, they get donations of prizes to give away and do service things as well (free hair cuts, nails, massages, etc).



My advice, decide specifically what you want to do, and work the churches within your organization for support and opportunities.

Interested in political events in Latin America - us history question. a little help?

Why is the United States interested in political events in Latin America?



Interested in political events in Latin America - us history question. a little help?opera cd



Well, one of the main reasons the US is interested in the Latin America political events is because they are so close to the United States. If, say, Cuba were to launch a missile at the US (which was almost done during the Cuban Missile Crisis in the Cold War), it would be catastrophic for the United States.

 
ltd